• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    16 days ago

    As someone that lives in the rural US and has no option for internet besides Starlink, I’d much rather have fiber. Starlink isn’t bad, but it’s garbage compared to fiber.

    Plus I don’t want to give Elmo my money. I really wish I had other options.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Fiber is amazing. I paid $90 for 400 down and 10 up on cable… Then moved to a place with fiber. My fiber is now $49 for 1,000 down and 1,000 up.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        in the west coast sonic can provide up to 10gbits. for 40$ starting price. catch is the COL is somewhat expensive. for the longest time xfinity was the only choice, and we have known thier constantly changing the tiers of the services to charge people more.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    There is absolutely no reason the US government shouldn’t be launching their own public satellite internet.

    Look at North Korea. People get killed for smuggling in flash drives with western media into the country. We could be streaming it from uninterruptible satellites. We could be fighting the global information war on a level most other countries could only dream of.

    On the domestic end, if we get Internet access to every corner of the country, it opens up remote work to every American. That could bring an incredible economic boost to impoverished rural areas.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 days ago

      Trump shut down Radio Free Asia. And Radio Free Europe, and Voice of America. I don’t think he cares about getting the message out there.

      And as far as a public Internet? Have you met the US? We can’t deliver electricity or water without someone making a profit on each unit of energy or water delivered. It’s unamerican. Why would satellite Internet be any different?

    • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yeah amigo, I get that’d be amazing but you think the government would want highly educated populace here and everywhere? and with free access to all kinds of information?

      Yeah right…

    • NotSerious@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      We are losing the information war at home. Why would we wish our terrible misinformation on anyone else? They’d turn this into a news max global broadcast system.

  • ugtug@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    16 days ago

    Satellite internet is simply never going to best the throughput and stability of fiber. Just another corrupt action so this administration can line their pockets.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      probably the point of putting it in the white house, so russia can monitor it.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    USA has always been corrupt. What’s chocking is the brazenness of this administration. Former administrations at least had the decency to do it in the shadows.

  • whaleiam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    Can starling even come close to the speed of fiber? I’m getting a gibabit a second for 50 bucks a month

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      Nowhere close. Wireless anything needs to share a band across multiple devices. With fiber, you can either have an exclusive run to the service provider or, at the very least, to a connection point shared with some neighbors.

    • Legume5534@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’ve seen about 250mbps down on a friend’s terminal. You can probably get faster.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      It’s not meant for that and won’t really ever compete well against it if fiber can be run there cost effectively, although there are odd situations even in cities where it’s useful.

      Like maybe there’s a warehouse in some part of a big city that somehow wasn’t connected and the utilities wants 50k to connect it.

      Realistically we can’t run fiber everywhere, but there’s many millions of more homes out there that could be but aren’t, and the telcos keep taking money to do the upgrades and do jack all.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      the latency for satellite signal is very problematic, while fiber is near instanenous. also satellite signals can be intercepted by hostile parties.