• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I don’t know about your situation and for whom you’re responsible, but until the binary election system changes – I cannot afford playing chicken with accelerationist rationale of choosing the Greater Poison in lieu of protecting my family and children – even if what some of what you say I agree with.

    Trump was never the better alternative to Hillary. If anyone though this, they were fooled by right-wing extremists. I voted Hillary, even though I campaigned for Sanders.

    Sanders in fact did the same thing, too, for the very reasons I laid out here.

    Now I go to DSA and Democratic meetings alike to advocate for the most progressive candidates possible during these Democratic primaries. That is where I and many others have the most agency to effect change and avoid more Spanbergers and Fettermans, etc.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Trump was never the better alternative to Hillary.

      Trump was the stalking horse of the Hilary campaign, via her Pied Piper Strategy.

      He would not have even been on the ballot had she not sponsored his run.

      Now we’re seeing the same dynamic in the LA mayor race, with the incumbent Karen Bass sending her donors to Spencer Pratt in order to keep a DSA rival off the final ballot.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        40 minutes ago

        Right. Because practically everyone at the time thought people would be crazy to vote for him in the first place.

        Which absent of the Electoral College, they were right. Hillary won 3 million more votes and both then and now was objectively the better candidate for whom to vote.