ThePunisher@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 hours agoWhite House reports discuss possible 25th Amendment removal of Donald Trumpnationalwired.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down121
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkWhite House reports discuss possible 25th Amendment removal of Donald Trumpnationalwired.comThePunisher@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 hours agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squarePsaldorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 hours agoIf I’m reading it right the VP and Congress can then say “nuh-uh” in the third step of the process. Which is the same as the first step, no? So if they decide to do it and he appeals they only have to do the same again. Why is that not valid?
minus-squareAreldyb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 hours agoA “nuh-uh” from the VP and Cabinet is what sends it to Congress.
If I’m reading it right the VP and Congress can then say “nuh-uh” in the third step of the process. Which is the same as the first step, no?
So if they decide to do it and he appeals they only have to do the same again. Why is that not valid?
A “nuh-uh” from the VP and Cabinet is what sends it to Congress.