• mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unless Bethesda manages to speed up production massively, I am not even fully convinced Fallout 5 will see the light of day while Todd has anything to do with it still.

    • locahosr443@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I still never understood how people rated vanilla f3 or skyrim above ‘meh’. Their last genuinely good game made in house was oblivion.

  • Stupendous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    TV show isn’t on any different trajectory than Fallout has been since Fallout 2. Ya it’s still a big jump in goofiness from 2 to Bethesda 3. But fallout 4 to TV show, that’s not huge leap into over reliance on 50s commercial aesthetic and goofiness and snark. I’d be more worried about elder scrolls 6. Skyrim didn’t dump out weird lore like oblivion which also had less weird lore than morrowind. Still solid though. Post Fallout 4, 76, Starfield, Fallout TV - I can see the next elder scrolls being a big up in goofiness for entertainment over weird lore that’s entertaining. Like lots of “until I took an arrow to the knee” attempts at meme-able characters

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      All they really need to do for ES6 is bring Michael Kirkbride back and let him run wild with the lore.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Alright Michael, we’re going to leave you alone to write in peace. There’s food and drinks in the fridge, and a small mountain of psychedelics in the cupboard.”

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Do folks enjoy Starfield these days?

    Or 76?

    I’ve been playing BGS since Oblivion, and my experience was:

    • 76 was boring, even with coop. That’s saying something. The world was interesting, but the main and side (fetch) quests were the dullest, buggiest things that kept trying to sell us some anti grind stuff; and this was well after launch.

    • Starfield was… well, even more boring. It felt like Fallout 3 with all the jank, 10X the production budget, 100X the graphics requirements (as smooth as a cactus on my 3090), yet somehow, none of the charm. I only played for a bit, but I don’t remember a single character name. Whereas I can still recall little side quests from Oblivion and FO3. Quirks persisted all the way from Oblivion, yet all the fun bugs were patched out. Basically, ME: Andromeda was better in every way.

    But, you know, whatever floats peoples boats. I’m curious if these games have grown a following over whatever I was missing.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Setting criticism of BGS aside, Fallout isn’t as “hard” with its lore as some. There are little inconsistencies between the games and other media that are basically written off as “gameplay mechanics things” or simple oversights.

    …Hence there will probably be conflicts with the TV show. But that’s fine. It’s nothing earth shattering for the IP.