• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    there should be a law that says all CEOs must shut the fuck up always and forever

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lucky for them, I won’t buy any new games. Too many fantastic older games to play that they didn’t cheat and cut corners to produce.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah we are on the losing side of history. The future will be total ai slop. People love it. We will be the grumpy old folks yelling that the tv ruined the world.

  • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes, like we don’t have Handmade tags in products…

    I dont know about the future, but a “No AI-Art” tag, makes sense to me.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have seen handmade tags, for stuff that wasn’t machine loomed, etc. But handmade clothing is mostly dead in the consumer world, unless you class mass production methods as handmade… Which they are made by hands in some stage

      • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Handmade clothes may be not the norm but they are not extinct. Dresses, scarfs and accesorising can be found handmade. Luxury market is in majority handmade.

        The point is that the label is not pointless. It exist and will exist in the future. I just hope that games with human art won’t be considered a luxury.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    3 days ago

    Even if that did happen, it wouldn’t defeat the point of the disclosures at all. In fact, people will appreciate it all the more if a game is made without any AI involvement and it will become a selling point.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      3 days ago

      Plus, shouldn’t he want that information to be front and center anyway if he actually thinks it’s a good thing?

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 days ago

        He, like the that Microsoft suit, has just enough awareness to realize how AI is being thought of by the general public, and knows it would affect his bottom line. Which is really all he cares about.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, there’s a solid group of us that hates AI so much we’d do this.

      I try to avoid it as best I can. When it comes to art, I won’t touch anything that’s AI.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      At a very near point though, it’s likely going to be impossible to do it without AI involvement, or at the very least without proving you didn’t somehow.

      AI is being baked into almost every dev and art tool. They aren’t just talking about using ChatGPT, if your game uses a single texture or model that ever got touched by a machine learning algorithm, you’re using AI.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        As long as AI doesn’t take away our hands, it’ll always be perfectly possible to draw our own art, compose our own music and write our own code. And especially in the open-source space, there’s plenty of creative software not jumping on the AI bandwagon.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s becoming nearly impossible to write code in a corporate environment without AI. Everyone has AI auto complete at the minimum, and AI code generation is at a point where it’s at least even with an entry level dev.

          • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m sure that’s the case at some companies, but where I work, I can freely choose which tools I use for coding and whether or not to use AI, despite one of my bosses being obsessed with it.

  • jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean he’s not wrong, it’s like saying we’re going to have a flag for whether the game uses stock/bought assets or like saying whether an animated movie uses cgi.

    The real issue is that many are using AI poorly, but as developers become more familiar with the tools and work them more seamlessly into their workflow, it can be beneficial.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Never thought I’d agree with Tim Sweeney on anything.

    John Carmack has a good take on AI in game dev too.

  • GLOOMSDAY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Using AI for checking a code, and then double checking it yourself is different than some waste of sperm dictating prompts to AI, and telling his friends at parties while high on ketamine adderol and coke “this is going to be the next Morrowind x Cyberpunk x Mario Brother Kart Theft Auto” is the AI badge Valve is talking about.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    And CEOs will be the easiest position to replace with AI. Can’t wait for the share holders to figure that out.