• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I rarely play the latest games, so that machine would be a good upgrade for me. Especially with the ability to load a different OS that I could use for both productivity and gaming.

    Bump it to a bigger SSD and 64GB of RAM and I’ll be happy with it.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Outperforms 70% of Gaming PCs” is the sort of statistic you’d only quote if you thought it sounded more impressive than it actually was, and it already doesn’t sound impressive.

    (edit: genuinely surprised how controversial a statement that turned out to be?)

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It doesn’t read to me like they think it’s impressive. It reads to me like they they are clarifying their market.

      A challenge will be how many laptop PC users who game on it because that’s all they have/can afford can be converted into steam machine buyers.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    They should just sell at a loss the steam games bought will make up for it. Every consol does that, why not this mini pc.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because since it’s unlocked hardware, corporations would buy them all as workstations, and they’d never buy any games. At the end of the day, corporations ruin everything.

    • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Every console does that and it’s kinda anti-competitive behavior isn’t it?

      Definitely makes it harder for new companies to release enticing hardware, so i’d say so…

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    8 GB of VRAM and 16 GB of RAM … those are the specs of my almost 15 years old legacy machine. I doubt that the Steam Machine outperforms anything made in the last 5-10 years.

    • nyankas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      These figures just haven‘t gone up all that much over the last decade. Sure, you can get 128GB of RAM and 24GB of VRAM if you‘re willing to pay for it. But if you don‘t want to spend upwards of $5000 for your PC and you‘re maybe not that experienced, you might just look for a gaming rig from a vendor you‘ve heard of before and get 16GB RAM and 8GB VRAM even in 2025 with current-gen hardware.

      • coyootje@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree, I think it’s all about affordability and ease of use. If they can sell them for a nice price (somewhere around the price of a PS5 pro) and they’re easy to use I don’t see a reason why they wouldn’t sell. Hell, I might even buy one myself. I have a very old gaming pc (close to 10 years old now) and even though I’ve replaced some parts over the years (ram, GPU, storage), the core of it is still very outdated and it might almost be cheaper to switch to something like this then to upgrade my existing pc.

    • alessandro@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I doubt that the Steam Machine outperforms anything made in the last 5-10 years.

      It’s all about the price… and the very recent years weren’t exactly kind in relation for price per performance