The arrested man identified himself as a combat veteran and said he was burning the American flag in protest of an executive order Trump signed Monday targeting flag burning.

    • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Come on dude, that’s another bad faith argument. The legality of setting fire to things is not determined after the fact.

      You’re better than this. Try to put more thought into your comments.

        • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s about what is legal and what is not legal.

          It’s not legal to set fire on the sidewalk. Everyone accepts that to be true and a pretty good law.

          Burning flags in general is legal, most people accept that to be true and think that it’s a pretty good law.

          When you do something illegal, while doing something legal, in order to prove that the second thing was legal. You muddy the waters and give ammunition to people who want the second thing to be illegal.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Or maybe stop apologizing for cruel dictators. They don’t need your help, so don’t help them. This “to be fair” and “decorum” crap has gotten us to a point where children are being kidnapped and raped without consequence, and free speech has been eliminated. I know you aren’t trying to be part of the problem, but I’m here to tell you that you absolutely, unequivocally, are part of the problem.

        • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeaaa, that’s pretty off base. You’re moving the goalposts. I just said it’s a crime to set fire to things on the sidewalk in a public and mentioned that it would be more responsible to do it with a metal bin or something.

          All of this “apologizing for cruel dictators” “you are part of the problem” bullshit is nonsense bad faith strawman argument. You were looking for someone to fight with and went after me because it suits you to do so.

          Picking fights like this with random people who agree with 98% of what you think because 2% of their opinions are different yours, is a right wingers wet dream. They love that you are doing this. They love that you would take time out of your day to attack your allies and further fracture resistance.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Just wanted to pop in to say all of this "master debater"ese is bullshit and people should stop taking those who endlessly rattle on about “goal posts” and logical fallacies seriously.

            This isn’t fucking debate club nor is it Ben Shapiro.

            I doubt anyone’s mind has ever been changed a single iota by this type of talk, and I find it pointless at best and fascist apologia at worst.

            • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I just wanted to add that there is a difference between a conversation and a sermon. If someone wants to ignore everything I say and make shit up just to spout nonsense, they can do that, but I’m going to call them out for it and I’m going to point out the ways in which they are having a text based masturbation session in my replies.

              Calling every person you disagree with a fascist apologist, gives space for real fascists to thrive, so thanks for helping them out with that I guess.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Dude saying stuff like because “he did this protest in a way that may have hypothetically inconvenienced or damaged someone or something and therefore it should be technically illegal and that’s fine” is fascist assistance.

                During Trump #1, I had conversations in real life with people that were arguing that the people in Charlottesville didn’t “have a proper permit”. The person I was having the conversation with was then and likely is now a fucking fascist. He voted for Trump in 2016, likely in 2020, and likely again in 2024.

                Be mindful of the company you keep.

                Concern trolls always approve of a conceptual protest but never quite find one that is tastefully or respectably done to their standards amongst actual protests (unless their side does it, then an insurrection is a tourist visit).

                This protest should not be illegal and was harmless. There’s no reason to get mealy mouthed about it.