inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 days agoSupreme Court to decide if ICE can arrest based on "apparent ethnicity"www.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1435arrow-down12
arrow-up1433arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court to decide if ICE can arrest based on "apparent ethnicity"www.newsweek.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareArchangel1313@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up41·5 days agoWasn’t this already decided when they ruled that stop-and-frisk laws were unconstitutional due to racial profiling?
minus-squaretburkhol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up52·5 days agoLol. You think this court cares what happened in 2013?
minus-squaretheprogressivist @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·5 days agoOnly if it happened in 1862.
minus-squareMediocre_Bard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 days agoThe court doesn’t give a fuck about anything but being corrupt at this point.
minus-squareLedivin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·5 days agoWhy respect precedent when you can just make a new one and get bribed for it?
Wasn’t this already decided when they ruled that stop-and-frisk laws were unconstitutional due to racial profiling?
Lol. You think this court cares what happened in 2013?
Only if it happened in 1862.
The court doesn’t give a fuck about anything but being corrupt at this point.
Why respect precedent when you can just make a new one and get bribed for it?