hoefully you caught part 1 in which russia propaganda news said an imminent ukrain falseflag would hit a ukrain bordercity right before the friday trumppootin talk.

heres their follow up.

https://www.rt.com/russia/622884-kiev-alaska-talks-escalation/

"On August 14, 2025, Russian officials reported Ukrainian drone strikes on the border city of Belgorod and the southern capital Rostov-on-Don, killing and injuring civilians. Rostov saw an apartment building struck, with over a dozen casualties; in Belgorod, three civilians were hurt when a drone hit a car downtown.

This came two days after the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) alleged that Ukrainian forces were preparing a false-flag provocation in the Kharkov region, complete with pre-positioned journalists – supposedly to shape a narrative blaming Moscow.

These incidents are not isolated. They fit into a larger operational and political pattern: each time high-level talks are scheduled Kiev steps up attacks on Russian regions."

So I cant help but notice the drone attack on russia is not actually a ukrain false flag. The article continues, as if they had been right, and points out other historical times they had been just as “right”.

what?

i pride myself on biased neither toward west nor east. Yet, from an origin of impartialness, and without even external research, my trust in RT drops. its like they tried to propaganda, and they thought they had their gun pointed at ukrain, but their gun was actually pointing backwards. they manage to cause loss of trust without even needing to verify anything.

Them saying a falseflag was coming and, when it didnt, glossing over it as if they had been right and coninuing using it to push their narrative is like someone saying 2012 is end of world, then world doesnt end, so they say “see! its exactly what weve been saying! now believe our other stuff!”

and yes thats how to spell ukrain