• k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    If there was no alternative, and debatably superior, version of the game currently available then this might be an issue. But there is, so the preservation of the IP is hardly jeopardized.

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        They could use the old one as a placemat to protect a table from having soup spilled on it.

      • k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The comparison is more akin to how they have actually restored the mona lisa with chemical and color correction as a means to make it withstand the test of time. Thats essentially what has happened with the remastered version of this game.

        I understand that in other instances, remasters and remakes might as well be a different game, but if you have played crysis, this is barely the case.

        Im not saying its fine to lose access to original data. All im saying is in this particular case, there isnt much loss to be outraged about. The publishers havent un-alived the IP. We have just lost access to some historical data.

        I am all for preservation. I dont want to underplay the detriments of lost data. I just want to subjectively quantify this loss.