• Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That’s not really a tricky balance, there is a clear right direction to pick

    I am curious, though. Did First Nation consultation result in any voiced resistance against vaccination?

    • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not really a tricky balance, there is a clear right direction to pick

      I love that you “know” the right direction without even knowing how margjnalized folks might feel about it.

      Just to be clear, your opinion is that the government should just force marginalized folks to do what we think is the right thing regardless of their feelings or experiences?

      (And if your second paragraph is a serious question, you could literally just google Canada First Nations vaccine hesitancy and learn a whole boatload.)

        • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sorry, I’m clearly not understanding your position… Vaccines should be mandatory but also not?

          • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes. Just like they already kind of are in a bunch of ways. At the very least they should be opt-out instead of opt-in, with immunization campaigns deployed in the spirit of increasingly making opt-out more exceptional

              • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                How so? Encouraging people to vaccinate their kids and making the vaccine free is still an “opt in” system. What I mean with an opt out system is that it would demand effort and a processual review to not vaccinate (at some level, even if at the community level), like filing for being excused of immunization and having that file as part of the immunization record.

                • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Maybe you should learn more about how the system functions before demanding changes?

                  Vaccines are largely done in schools with parents having to opt out.

                  All you’ve prosed is to add a weird layer of bureaucracy with no discernible benefit.

                  Edit: And yes, refusals to vaccinate are already part of someone’s record. (This system is already used to contact people who have refused and to offer another round of immunizations etc.)

                  • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    But that bureaucracy is what I mean with friction that defines what opting out means. Being invited to immunization and having ease to refuse is still opt in to me.

                    refusals to vaccinate are already part of someone’s record

                    Maybe I am just unaware but what I understood from what goes into the record is that someone saying “no thanks, vaccines are a lie” is indistinguishable from “the healthcare system wronged my community so I don’t feel safe with this”. If those cases are indeed already distinguishable and I’m just mistaken, then I’ll be gladly corrected because it means that we are already equipped to to make vaccination mandatory, because all we need is to have the due process to accommodate the concerns of the second group.