• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    A lot of things could have cost Harris the election. If you have 4 people of varying strengths try to lift (with varying effort) a couch and fail to move it, do you blame the strongest person? The person that contributed the least lift? The person whose effort is much smaller that what they could lift? All four equally? The person who picked the people to move the couch?

    Depending on how you parse the data, you could come to opposite conclusions (Harris lost because she wasn’t pro-Israel enough! Harris lost because she was to much pro-genocide!)

    What people who want to win next time need to do is look at their part of the failure (how do we get more youth to vote; how do we bring out the base; how do we secure the center; how do we strike back against lies; how do we stop the flow of foreign money…) and fix it for next time so that there are many ways the liberal candidate can win. THEN we can debate about WHICH candidate that should be.

    • thedruid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Yep, people have no idea that most data filled reports aren’t really truths, but interpretations to fit the story the originator wants to tell

      Data tells you what happened. Not why