Wisconsin state bribery statute. I’m not seeing any wiggle room here. Someone should check this judge’s finances.
Fucking cheeseheads don’t see the road they’re going down
Not all of us are blinded by cheddar.
Some of us are though
Find more like that and you may have hope
Trump stated in November that the Hatch Act was not to be enforced. This also means we can be harassed, threatened, cajoled, bribed, or just about anything, really, while standing in line to vote in 2028. If it even happens. It may. It may just count on the shenanigans happening in blue areas.
2026
The midterms are going to be brutal; Republicans can’t afford to lose either chamber of Congress.
Midterms? You think there will be midterms? Optimist!
Haha I know 🫠
The midterms will be the prequel to 2028
this but much, much worse.
They need to just show up and arrest him as soon as he hands over the giant check. The promise alone was a crime, but actually handing out the money makes it that much more of an open and shut case. Even if he claims that this isn’t a prize but hiring someone to be a spokesperson (as he did last time), that’s still just as illegal under Wisconsin law.
He’s still the world’s richest man and there’s no telling what first lady Donald might do to try to get his fascist piggy bank out of jail, but it’s better than just sitting back and letting them buy votes.
Don’t think (stay)
Drink your wine (home)
Watch the fire burn (be)
His problem’s not mine (safe)
Just be that model citizen
I wish I had a schilling
for every senseless killing I’d buy a government
America’s for sale
And you can get a good deal on it
And make a healthy profit
The whole of War on Errorism may have been correct but I think it was a tad too optimistic with the line “a million people are smart, smarter than one,” because, obviously, they aren’t.
This is The Decline, not War on Errorism.
Damn, ya got me, I’ll hand in my card
It’s two 1 million dollar payment each going to random audience members right? At an event you’re only supposed to attend if you voted for the supreme Court there? Is that correct?
He changed it. He said that at first and then changed it to only people that signed some petition against judges that told trump he couldn’t do something. My guess is a lawyer looked at it and told him it was blatantly illegal.