• Poayjay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    2 days ago

    If companies stop reporting quarterly, then all of the bad news is going to come all at once at the end of the of most companies fiscal year in the fall. Since it’s every industry, the entire market will surge or sink every fall. If people had insider knowledge, well that’s a yearly wealth transfer from your 401k to the 1%.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m just thinking that Taco wants it to be timed right after things, like, oh, say, midterm elections.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      Next up will be “get rid of annual reporting”. They’ll change it to be “every 4 years, the first Tuesday after the presidential election”.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      If companies stop reporting quarterly, then all of the bad news is going to come all at once at the end of the of most companies fiscal year in the fall.

      Also, it isn’t as though they won’t have internal reports. And given the deplorable state of the SEC, I have to assume this would lead to some wild insider trading in between annual releases.

      If people had insider knowledge, well that’s a yearly wealth transfer from your 401k to the 1%.

      It’s arguably worse than that. People passing around unregulated reports under the table can still lie to one another with abandon. So the black market for inside info is ripe for fraud and scams which can’t even be prosecuted normally, because its not information anyone has to report out to a public commission.

      If I want to come in and release the “Double Super Secret Real Microsoft Numbers” and spread it around, I can effectively manipulate the price of the stock based on how many people I can dupe into believing my phony figures.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Alternatively, global investors will start to shun the US, because US companies don’t have to be as transparent anymore. Then there is a giant sucking sound of capital out of US markets, and the stock market and dollar tanks.

      You would think that a President would want to avoid this, but most of his wealth is now in crypto, and if the dollar tanks his crypto is worth more dollars.

      He is so transparently out for his own gain, and those of his Crypto Broligarch friends, over what is best for the country as a whole.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        global investors will start to shun the US

        Where would investors go instead? The UK, EU, and Japan already eliminated quarterly disclosure requirements.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        He also owns a large portion of a publicly traded company and is seeking to be able to obscure his finances there more than they already are.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        An awful lot of crypto seems to track along with the American stock market. Maybe not an exact mirror, but if watch big drops/gains in S&P, you’ll usually see big drops/gains in something like BTC, anyway.

        Not sure about Taco’s shitcoins, though.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, but if the dollar tanks then crypto arbitrage bots will make sure the value of the dollar vs. crypto tanks along with it. People invested in crypto (but who live in dollars) get a big win at the expense of everyone else.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You would think that would happen but I doubt it at this point.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “if we stopped testing we’d have less cases”

    This is just to hide how badly things are going.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stop reporting so that we don’t see the worsening economy. That’s all. Covid doesn’t happen if nobody reports cases. Fraud and tax dodging doesn’t happen if you cut the IRS’s budget so they can’t investigate. Same old shit, cut oversight so the bad thing magically disappears. You don’t even need a Memory Hole if there’s nothing to put in it.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like this is one of those rare cases where Trump and I agree on something, but it’s still ultimately for completely different reasons. I suspect not having to report quarterly will make it easier for his companies to cook the books.

    • waddle_dee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      May I inquire how this could be a good thing? I feel like it could exacerbate problems, but I’m not well versed enough in macroeconomics to make an accurate assessment.

      • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Quarterly reporting makes company leadership focus on short term gains over the long term health of the company, leading to frequent layoffs, selloffs and other actions that hurt both the employees and the economy as a whole.

        • Dagnet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          but then you would need to have reports once every 5 years to actually see much change in their strategies.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Quarterly reporting itself does not force this.

          Relatedly, people compensated mostly through stock options will continue to think short term with an emphasis on the stock price of the company for the duration of their particular vesting period.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          We are talking about when they are required to release earnings not the only time they can. I’m pretty sure that lengthening the time wouldn’t really change anything as far as short term profit gain is concerned.

          Like I doubt the quarterly earnings calls would go away, shareholders wouldn’t want to go a whole year without hearing from the company, they would just be a lot more lies and fluff.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I assume it is because they draw attention to companies struggling. Easier for him to deflect once a year than it is 4 times a year. If people don’t know what to expect they can blindly throw money into companies all year and not realize they haven’t hit projections in 9 months.